Intro Body Portrait Static Image
Hero Scroll Indicator
Supertext Portrait Center Portrait Left Portrait Right Portrait Logo Collage

The Brands Physically Closest to Us

Brands used in, on, or around the body, have an above average Brand Intimacy Quotient, meaning we connect with them more emotionally. Within this ecosystem, we have created three groupings: brands we apply, brands we wear, and brands we eat.

Apply

Brands we apply are the least intimate in our ecosystem, perhaps because they are on top of our face, skin, and hair and are more temporary in nature. We are more intimate with health and hygiene brands vs. beauty brands, perhaps because they serve a more essential function.

Archetypes
Dominant archetype
Fulfillment

32

Stages
Average quotient score

34.4

Top performers
Quotient

47.8

45.2
43.1
41.8
39.8

Apply

a woman applying cream to her face
Top Archetype
Fulfillment

32

Top Stage
Sharing

13

Top Performers

47.8

Brands we apply are the least intimate in our ecosystem, perhaps because they are on top of our face, skin, and hair and are more temporary in nature. We are more intimate with health and hygiene brands vs. beauty brands, perhaps because they serve a more essential function.

Wear

Brands that we wear, although also on top of the body, cover intimate areas and often convey a strong sense of identity about who we are. We also tend to connect more strongly with sports brands vs. other apparel.

Archetypes
Dominant archetype
Fulfillment

00

Stages
Average quotient score

38.7

Top performers
Quotient

46.9

46.0
45.7
44.5
44.5

Wear

a young woman looking at her clothes in a mirror
Top Archetype
Fulfillment

34

Top Stage
Sharing

15

Top Performers

46.9

Brands that we wear, although also on top of the body, cover intimate areas and often convey a strong sense of identity about who we are. We also tend to connect more strongly with sports brands vs. other apparel.

Eat

We are most intimate with brands that we eat compared to brands we apply or wear. This is likely because they go directly into our bodies and are often associated with happiness and nostalgia. Also, sweeter brands score higher than savory.

Archetypes
Dominant archetype
Fulfillment

48

Stages
Average quotient score

42.0

Top performers
Quotient

52.5

49.9
49.4
48.8
48.5

Eat

a girl eating with a spoon from a jar
Top Archetype
Fulfillment

29

Top Stage
Sharing

17

Top Performers

52.5

We are most intimate with brands that we eat compared to brands we apply or wear. This is likely because they go directly into our bodies and are often associated with happiness and nostalgia. Also, sweeter brands score higher than savory.

Body Ecosystem

A focus on the brands on and around our bodies, including the products that we apply, wear, and eat to our skin and hair.

LESS INTIMATE
APPLY
WEAR
EAT
34.4
Average Quotient Score
38.7
Average Quotient Score
42.0
Average Quotient Score

MORE INTIMATE

At a Glance

Review a quick snapshot of how different sectors within the Body Ecosystem perform relative to archetypes, stages, and performance.

quick snapshot of how different sectors within the Body Ecosystem perform relative to archetypes, stages, and performance.
quick snapshot of how different sectors within the Body Ecosystem perform relative to archetypes, stages, and performance.

Explore Other Ecosystems

Home Ecosystem

Home

A deeper look at the brands filling the rooms of our homes, and how we connect with the different places in our homes.

Explore Ecosystem
Smartphone Ecosystem

Smartphone

Insights into the brands that enable and enrich our phones, including device brands, apps, content, and access providers.

Explore Ecosystem

Additional Content

Watch our Brand Ecosystems video

Video

Watch our Brand Ecosystems video exploring insights into how we build bonds with the brands that surround us.

Watch Video
Brand Intimacy Dimensioned Across Three Ecosystems: Our Bodies, Our Smartphones, and Our Homes

Article

Our analysis on what the Brand Ecosystems results say about the brands that surround us.

Read More